#YOUCOMNPLETEME CYGWIN PYTHON 3 PATCH#
#YOUCOMNPLETEME CYGWIN PYTHON 3 FULL#
#YOUCOMNPLETEME CYGWIN PYTHON 3 CODE#

Links to msvcrt.dll and has no POSIX translation/compatibility layer like the Cygwin DLL. MinGW(-w64) is a native compiler for Win32 just as MSVC is. Note this has really nothing to do with current Cygwin or the cygwin platform MinGW was part of the Cygwin source for a long time, and every MinGW compiler was burdened to search the Cygwin header and lib paths. Anyone using GCC 4.3 on MinGW should be shot (but that's just my humble opinion, rather radical I admit -) ) It looks like GCC 4.4 and up have this change in them, by looking at their commit logs. Any GCC (major) version released after that will have it completely removed.Дeprecation happened (according to the first doc change mentioning this option as being deprecated) on :

#YOUCOMNPLETEME CYGWIN PYTHON 3 FULL#

The commit I linked to has the full option removal at Octo(see the fifth item in the changelog entry). > Does anyone have more official documentation?

removing -mno-cygwin if self.gcc_version >= some version ThatвЂ™s why I propose adding a version check* instead of just removing the option.

#YOUCOMNPLETEME CYGWIN PYTHON 3 CODE#

> and is there any reason why it can't be removed?ДЇor distutils, we have to work on eggshells when fixing bugs to make sure we donвЂ™t break third-party code that relies on known bugs or works around them. I donвЂ™t think any Python core developer is using Cygwin. Simply because distutils had no dedicated maintainer for a long time, and because nobody was aware of this change. The compile log from the third link is attached as a file.) Such services offer no guarantee of continued availability of hosted resources or links, but it is useful to keep information on this bug tracker for future reference. (In the future, it would be nice of you not to use URL obfuscators or pastebins.

#YOUCOMNPLETEME CYGWIN PYTHON 3 PATCH#

Does anyone have more official documentation? If we can find the first gcc version that deprecates this option, then IвЂ™ll be able to make a patch with a version check (in order not to change previously working code). This canвЂ™t be fixed in 2.5, 2.6 or 3.1, which are in security-fix only mode, but we can do something for the active branches.ДЄ quick web search finds reference of this deprecation/removal as far as 2007. The changelog is a bit cryptic, but note the last two items 'removing documentation from removed option'. For those that don't want to believe a random person's comment on a bugtracker, here's the commit: I can confirm the option has been removed. Why is -mno-cygwin still be used, and is there any reason why it can't be removed? I recently ran into it trying to build a Mercurial snapshot using a MinGW GCC v4.6.2 flavor The use of -mno-cygwin at causes build failures with versions of MinGW GCC. Issue12641-modernize_cygwin&mingw_Д 001-MINGW-issue12641-customize-mingw-cygwin-compilers.patchД 001-MINGW-issue12641-check-if-cygwin-mingw-compiler-supp.patchД 001-MINGW-issue12641-avoid-syntax-warning.patch Jeffrey.Armstrong, Martin.Fiers, Michael.Clerx, Pete.Forman, RubyTuesdayDONO, Seppo.Yli-Olli, alexis, christian.heimes, cmcqueen1975, danmbox, doko, eric.araujo, fratti, gaudyallure52, geertj, honorableinvasi, jkloth, jonforums, jwilk, lemburg, lewisl, loewis, ned.deily, oscarbenjamin, paul.moore, pitrou, pje, python-dev, rivy, rpetrov, rubenvb, santoso.wijaya, schmir, stakingrainbow2, tarekД¬reated on 17:02 by jonforums, last changed 01:46 by ned.deily.

Youcomnpleteme cygwin python 3